The nihilist critique of monism

This page is unfinished. It may be a mere placeholder in the book outline. Or, the text below (if any) may be a summary, or a discussion of what the page will say, or a partial or rough draft.

The nihilist critique of monist eternalism is that it is factually false.

Although this critique is correct, it has recently become decreasingly effective. Widespread skepticism about the authority of science, and increasing acceptance of the view that “all beliefs are equally valid,” allow people to dismiss factual accuracy as irrelevant to spiritual truth.

Navigation

This page is in the section ⚒︎ Critiques of monism,
      which is in ⚒︎ Monism: the denial of difference,
      which is in Unity and diversity,
      which is in Doing meaning better.

The next page in this section is ⚒︎ The complete stance’s critique of monism.

The previous page is ⚒︎ The dualist critique of monism.

General explanation: Meaningness is a hypertext book. Start with an appetizer, or the table of contents. Its “metablog” includes additional essays that are not part of the book.

To hear about new content, Subscribe by email subscribe to my email newsletter, Follow Meaningness on Twitter follow me on Twitter, use the Syndicate content RSS feed, or see the list of recent pages.

Click on terms with dotted underlining to read a definition.

The book is a work in progress; pages marked ⚒︎ are under construction.