Comments on “Schematic overview: capability”


What left columners think of right columners

I’m very much in the left column here- and I’m realizing that I’m very judgmental of folks in the right column, the victim-thinkers. Their approach is so counter to mine that they are the hardest for me to generate compassion for. Seeing it laid out like this may help though.

I wonder if one day you’ll add another dimensions to these diagrams to show how each stance typically thinks of the other, and how they can better understand each other.

How each stance typically thinks of the other

I hadn’t thought of putting that in the tables—it’s a good suggestion, thanks!

As with each of these, the third column is supposed to be accurate. The best discussion I know of, for this dimension of meaningness, is in the unfortunately mis-named Guru Papers. I have notes on it here; the bits on total responsibility vs victim think are in the notes to pp. 138-149.

Add new comment


This page is in the section ⚒︎ Capability,
      which is in Doing meaning better.

The next page in this section is ⚒︎ Total responsibility.

General explanation: Meaningness is a hypertext book. Start with an appetizer, or the table of contents. Its “metablog” includes additional essays that are not part of the book.

To hear about new content, Subscribe by email subscribe to my email newsletter, Follow Meaningness on Twitter follow me on Twitter, use the Syndicate content RSS feed, or see the list of recent pages.

Click on terms with dotted underlining to read a definition.

The book is a work in progress; pages marked ⚒︎ are under construction.