Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.
Meaningness is a hypertext book (in progress), plus a “metablog” that comments on it. The book begins with an appetizer. Alternatively, you might like to look at its table of contents, or some other starting points.
For automatic email notifications of new pages, please subscribe! (You can unsubscribe at any time with a link provided in the emails.)
I present a unified story, in divergent styles, across several web sites, of which this is the main one.
I write mainly web books—expositions extended over dozens of web pages—rather than stand-alone essays. Here are some popular individual pages, though, sampled from several sites:
- An appetizer: purpose
- An introduction to the main ideas, via the question: What—if anything—is “purpose”?
- Geeks, MOPs, and sociopaths in subculture evolution
- Subcultures were the main creative cultural force from roughly 1975 to 2000, when they stopped working. Why?
- “Ethics” is advertising
- Claims about ethics mainly function to make oneself attractive.
- A first lesson in meta-rationality
- Using Bongard problems to introduce patterns of intellectual insight that respect, but transcend, systematic rationality.
- Developing ethical, social, and cognitive competence
- A summary of Robert Kegan’s model of adult development; and its personal, social, and cultural implications.
I did a PhD in artificial intelligence at MIT. My undergraduate degree was in math. I’ve also studied cognitive science, biochemistry, Old English and Ancient Greek literature. None of that qualifies me to write Meaningness, but it may explain a certain STEM-ish orientation, decorated with occasional literary jokes. The closest thing I’ve written to an autobiography explains how I became a fictional character in Ken Wilber’s philosophical novel about artificial intelligence.
I have founded, managed, grown, and sold a successful biotech informatics company. That may explain a certain practical orientation, and lack of interest in philosophical theories that depend on the world being very unlike the way it appears.
I am, somewhat reluctantly, a Buddhist. Of an odd sort: “the opposite of whatever you’d expect” comes close. That sort of Buddhism shares central themes with Meaningness. I explain it on several other web sites:
- A window has recently opened for Buddhist innovations that can address new cultural, social, and personal problems. Vividness explores possible futures, based on Buddhism’s history and its interactions with the modern–and postmodern—world. I am developing the possibility of reinventing Vajrayana Buddhism for the 21st century global culture.
- Buddhism for Vampires is a playful, yet deadly serious, look at the dark side of Buddhism. We are all monsters, but we can embrace our monstrosity while retaining our human nobility. We can allow each to transform the other, so we become cheerful, kind, useful monsters who are also overpowering, unpredictable, and dangerous heroes.
- On Approaching the Aro gTér I write about the particular Tibetan Buddhist lineage I practice. I also discuss Vajrayana Buddhism in general, and especially Dzogchen.
(Each of these has its own email notifications; sign up for whichever you are interested in on the respective site.)