Comments on “Participation”

Intrigued by the idea of participation as a concept between/including duality and monism. When will this “book” be fleshed out? When can we expect more information here? I think you’re on to something and would love to read more.

For now, I don’t fully understand fluid mode and now it seems I’m confused about how to differentiate participation and fluid modes.

Also, I’ve found that participation seems to be close to how I prefer to view boundaries between objects, concepts, and ideas. All experience seems to me cloud-like and it’s like concentrated around words associated with concepts/ideas. From words, we can derive definitions, which I prefer to call abstract concepts - this is how I see boundaries are being applied to clouds of experience (from different point of view: it feels like I sever or restrict possible associations between initial concepts in process of formulation/formalization/giving a definition - synonyms to me here, but I dare to say we are not always aware of what exactly associations we got rid of in the process).

This is good stuff… Author, please connect with me when you can:

www ionurse dot com backsplash ontology dot ht & ml