Return to main page (Kitsch and naïveté)
The Forrest Gump quote is applicable here: “Shit happens.”
I was reading through the text with hipsters in mind. They seem to me to be a good example of idiotically optimistic. Would someone like Charles Bukowski function, for you, as and antidote to this idiocy or would his approach seem “so real” as to be read an intentional antidote? Or maybe his work is a forced antidote that is false somehow? Would you be able to provide me with an example of solid antidote that feels viable in art or literature?
False and exaggerated emotion is characteristic of eternalist kitsch.
This is a reaction to 19th-century literary sentimentality. However, the prototypical example of eternalist kitsch is medieval Christian art, which (both Byzantine and European) deliberately shows no emotion at all–as emotion was then considered to be of the flesh, and so inherently sinful.
I like some kitsch decor items, but I think they can also be classified as “retro”. I’m closer to being nihilistic than idiotically optimistic, however.
More information about text formats
This page is in the section Eternalist ploys and their antidotes, which is in Eternalism: the fixation of meaning, which is in Meaning and meaninglessness, which is in Doing meaning better.
☞ The next page in this section is ⚒︎ Armed & armored eternalism.
☜ The previous page is ⚒︎ Hiding from nebulosity.
General explanation: Meaningness is a hypertext book. Start with an appetizer, or the table of contents. Its “metablog” includes additional essays, not part the book.
Subscribe to new content by email. Click on terms with dotted underlining to read a definition. The book is a work in progress; pages marked ⚒︎ are under construction.
Subscribe by email
Follow me on Twitter