Comments on “Kadag”

Comments

Straw dogs

James's picture

I think I finally got what you’re trying to say here when I connected it with straw dogs, ceremonial objects that hold a place of reverence during the ceremony but are discarded afterward. The straw dogs are not inherently sacred or inherently worthless: their status comes from the context in which they are encountered.

More to the point, the straw dog’s contextual sacredness is not an arbitrary choice. You can decide to have the ceremony or not, of course, but once the ceremony has begun, it is sacred; and once it’s over, it’s not. Continuing the treat it as sacred afterward is as inappropriate as trampling it beneath your feet during the ceremony.

Straw dogs

I didn’t know about this! Thank you very much. Yes, from the brief Wiki discussion it seems relevant.

Add new comment

Navigation

This page is in the section ⚒ Sacredness,
      which is in Doing meaning better.

This is the last page in its section.

The next page in book-reading order is ⚒ Contingency.

The previous page is ⚒ Secularism.

This page’s topic is Sacredness.

General explanation: Meaningness is a hypertext book (in progress), plus a “metablog” that comments on it. The book begins with an appetizer. Alternatively, you might like to look at its table of contents, or some other starting points. Classification of pages by topics supplements the book and metablog structures. Terms with dotted underlining (example: meaningness) show a definition if you click on them. Pages marked with ⚒ are still under construction. Copyright ©2010–2020 David Chapman. Some links are part of Amazon Affiliate Program.