Comments on “Kadag”


Straw dogs

James's picture

I think I finally got what you’re trying to say here when I connected it with straw dogs, ceremonial objects that hold a place of reverence during the ceremony but are discarded afterward. The straw dogs are not inherently sacred or inherently worthless: their status comes from the context in which they are encountered.

More to the point, the straw dog’s contextual sacredness is not an arbitrary choice. You can decide to have the ceremony or not, of course, but once the ceremony has begun, it is sacred; and once it’s over, it’s not. Continuing the treat it as sacred afterward is as inappropriate as trampling it beneath your feet during the ceremony.

Straw dogs

I didn’t know about this! Thank you very much. Yes, from the brief Wiki discussion it seems relevant.

Add new comment


This page is in the section ⚒︎ Sacredness,
      which is in Doing meaning better.

This is the last page in its section.

The next page in book-reading order is ⚒︎ Contingency.

The previous page is ⚒︎ Secularism.

General explanation: Meaningness is a hypertext book. Start with an appetizer, or the table of contents. Its “metablog” includes additional essays, not part the book.

Subscribe to new content by email. Click on terms with dotted underlining to read a definition. The book is a work in progress; pages marked ⚒︎ are under construction.